Matthew Hayden must be silently laughing away to glory in Chennai. First, he's set up the Chennai Superkings' topping of the IPL Standings Table. Next and most importantly, our dear Bhajji has given us quite some reason to mull upon the veracity of
Mattie's comment. Just his body language has been quite something over the past few years. Tantrums are bad enough, but when they come from someone who is doing seriously something, it is tolerable, rather, justified, but still, not something to be emulated or followed or practised. Bhajji was quite okay to start with, aggression is always essential in sport, but Bhajji has, more often than not, exhibited misplaced aggression and meaningless anger. And, to add to it, he's been nowhere near his best (which was around 2001 and a few years immediately after). I was among the countless people who supported him when he was vilified in Australia, but I have never been for his "more-than-just-plain-aggression" acts on the cricketing field. A few decent performances here and there, and the absence of a quality spinner to replace a waning Kumble are the primary reasons Bhajji still finds himself in the eleven, plus of course, a whole lot of gimmicks misconstrued as "aggression" and "attitude". The most recent ugly episode of
Bhajji slapping Sreesanth has seriously made one sit up and think about us having our own Akthar. Fact of the matter is, Harbhajan is nowhere near Akhthar as far as talent is concerned, he probably could have been compared a few years back, not now. And even if it were tantrums, they ought not to be tolerated. That Sreesanth is no saint is well known, and he probably indulged in
some entertaining gimmicks to once again hog some of the limelight, which, he seems to be rather enjoying. But still, it's high time we start weeding out such unsavoury characters that, time and again, subscribe to nonsense, which, irrespective of whether it brings disrepute to the game or not, is certainly in sick taste.
Mattie, you're probably right after all.